|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News
HPV vaccine can prevent genital warts in men
Article
Researchers Identify Novel Type of Antibody that
Potently Inhibits HIV Infection
A small antibody fragment that is highly effective in neutralizing the
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by preventing the virus from entering
cells has been identified by researchers at the National Cancer Institute
(NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This finding may
provide insight into the development of new treatments against HIV and other
viruses, hopefully in the not too distant future. The study appears online
Oct. 20, 2008, in Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
New CDC/HHS rule on HIV as communicable disease
in immigration:
You recall on Sept 30, Dept of Homeland Security
reached its unfortunate decision on visa waivers for HIV positive
individuals, rejecting most of the overwhelming comments it received and
maintaining its burdensome and discriminatory visa policy. DHS justified the
action in part by saying this "interim measure" awaits HHS' removing HIV
soon from the list of communicable diseases for purposes of immigration. On
Oct 6 in the Washington Post CDC director Julie Gerberding defended that
view. However, on the very same day, Oct 6, HHS/CDC published the attached
interim and proposed rule revising the list of communicable diseases with
time for comment- reiterating that HIV is an important part of the list and
remaining so. The Oct 6 rule revises requirements to add other diseases to
the list of communicable diseases as grounds for inadmissibility. It makes
no nod to the issue of removing HIV from the list despite the rationale it
uses that the current regulations "are outdated' and "no longer in keeping
with current medical knowledge." It repeats that it supports all diseases on
the list, including HIV, because of its view of risks to the population and
costs. Although this rule is not the promised proposal to remove HIV that
CDC has stated it intends to consider, it is still another kick in the shins
of failing to do more than just talk. Comments on this interim rule allowed
till December 5.
Text of the interim rule
Study traces AIDS virus origin to 100 years ago
By MALCOLM RITTER, AP Science Writer
Wed Oct 1, 3:35 PM ET
NEW YORK - The AIDS virus has been circulating
among people for about 100 years, decades longer than scientists had
thought, a new study suggests. Genetic analysis pushes the estimated origin
of HIV back to between 1884 and 1924, with a more focused estimate at 1908.
Previously, scientists had estimated the origin
at around 1930. AIDS wasn't recognized formally until 1981 when it got the
attention of public health officials in the United States.
The new result is "not a monumental shift, but it
means the virus was circulating under our radar even longer than we knew,"
says Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona, an author of the new
work.
The results appear in Thursday's issue of the
journal Nature. Researchers note that the newly calculated dates fall during
the rise of cities in Africa, and they suggest urban development may have
promoted HIV's initial establishment and early spread.
Scientists say HIV descended from a chimpanzee
virus that jumped to humans in Africa, probably when people butchered
chimps. Many individuals were probably infected that way, but so few other
people caught the virus that it failed to get a lasting foothold,
researchers say.
But the growth of African cities may have changed
that by putting lots of people close together and promoting prostitution,
Worobey suggested. "Cities are kind of ideal for a virus like HIV,"
providing more chances for infected people to pass the virus to others, he
said.
Perhaps a person infected with the AIDS virus in
a rural area went to what is now Kinshasa, Congo, "and now you've got the
spark arriving in the tinderbox," Worobey said.
Key to the new work was the discovery of an HIV
sample that had been taken from a woman in Kinshasa in 1960. It was only the
second such sample to be found from before 1976; the other was from 1959,
also from Kinshasa.
Researchers took advantage of the fact that HIV
mutates rapidly. So two strains from a common ancestor quickly become less
and less alike in their genetic material over time. That allows scientists
to "run the clock backward" by calculating how long it would take for
various strains to become as different as they are observed to be. That
would indicate when they both sprang from their most recent common ancestor.
The new work used genetic data from the two old
HIV samples plus more than 100 modern samples to create a family tree going
back to these samples' last common ancestor. Researchers got various answers
under various approaches for when that ancestor virus appeared, but the
1884-to-1924 bracket is probably the most reliable, Worobey said.
The new work is "clearly an improvement" over the
previous estimate of around 1930, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Md. His
institute helped pay for the work.
Fauci described the advance as "a fine-tuning."
Experts say it's no surprise that HIV circulated
in humans for about 70 years before being recognized. An infection usually
takes years to produce obvious symptoms, a lag that can mask the role of the
virus, and it would have infected relatively few Africans early in its
spread, they said.

Final Rule on
Issuance of a Visa and Authorization for
Temporary Admission into the United States for Non-
Immigrants (Temporary Travelers into the United
States) with HIV.
On December 1, 2006 (World AIDS Day)
the White House announced that the President would “direct the
Secretary of State to request and the Secretary of Homeland
Security to initiate a rulemaking that would propose a
categorical waiver for HIV-positive people seeking to enter the
United States on short-term visas.”
On September 29, 2008 the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule for a
streamlined process for HIV-positive people to enter the United
States.
The basics:
The final rule does not create
a new regulatory scheme that would permit HIV- positive persons
to enter the United States temporarily nor does it change the
law for HIV+ immigrants already in the U.S., most of whom are
barred from attaining legal status except in extremely limited
circumstances.
HIV-positive immigrants would
still be inadmissible under the new rule and
subject to the 2 12(g) waiver requirements, including the need
for a qualifying family member, private health insurance, etc.1
Under the new rule HIV-positive
travelers seeking a waiver would be limited to admission on
a B-1 (entering for a short business related reason) or B-2 visa
(visitors for pleasure) for visits of 30 days or less. However,
under the new rule, they would be able to apply for a waiver to
allow them admission into the United States without prior
approval
1
On July 30, 2008, the President signed into law the Tom Lantos
and Henry J. Hyde United States Global Leadership Against
HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008,
Public Law No. 110-293. Section 305
of P.L. 110-293 amends section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) so that HHS is no longer
required to designate HIV
infection as a communicable disease of public health
significance.” However the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has not amended 42 CFR
34.2(b) to remove HIV infection from the list of diseases that
qualify
as a “communicable disease of
public health significance.” Until HHS does amend 42 CFR 34.2(b)
HIV-positive individuals will continue to be inadmissible under
212(a)( 1)(A)(i) of the INA.
by the Secretary of Homeland
Security. In other words, the determination on their application
could be made at the consular officer level in their home
countries rather than by the Department of Homeland Security.
The “visa stamp” would be valid for 12 months or less; and the
traveler would be allowed into the U.S. for 2 “visits” not to
exceed 30 days. Waiver applicants would still be allowed to
apply under the current system, i.e., through DHS.
Criteria for entry:
In general: Any person who is
inadmissible under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the INA due to HIV
infection may be issued a B-1 (business visitor) or B-2 (visitor
for pleasure) nonimmigrant visa by a consular officer or the
Secretary of State, and may be admitted to the United States for
a period not to exceed 30 days, provided that:
·
The applicant has tested positive for
HIV.
·
Controlled state of HIV:
The applicant needs to demonstrate that they are asymptomatic.
·
Evidence: An
applicant must prove he or she has been counseled on, and
understands the nature, severity and the communicability of his
or her medical condition. The applicant must also provide the
consular officer with evidence that (a) the danger to the public
health is minimal; (b) the possibility of transmission of HIV is
minimal; (c) no cost will accrue to any government agency
without prior consent.
·
Drug supply: Under
this final rule, applicants would have to establish that they
have in their possession or will have access to an adequate
supply of antiretrovirals (ARVs) to last for the duration of
their trip to the United States.
·
Assets: Applicants
would also have to prove they have sufficient assets (such as
insurance) to cover any medical care they may need while in the
United States.
·
Inadmissibility pursuant to the Visa
Waiver Program: The Visa Waiver Program allows
travelers from certain countries to enter the U.S. without a
visa provided they are not “inadmissible.” HIV-positive
travelers from these countries are considered “inadmissible” and
have always been required to get a visa. This new rule upholds
and makes explicit their inadmissibility under the Visa Waiver
Program.
·
Extension of stay and/or change in
status: Under the new rule, waiver applicants
would be required to forgo the opportunity to apply for an
extension of their stay, a change in nonimmigrant status, or an
adjustment of status to that of permanent resident. This means:
1.
Travelers would only be permitted to extend their stays in the
U.S. beyond 30 days if they demonstrate exigent circumstances should
the need arise.
2.
Should an applicant have the opportunity to apply for a work
visa, they would have to return home to do so.
3.
Applicants would not be allowed to apply for a green card
within the United States if they entered pursuant to this waiver.
Failure to comply:
If a traveler does not comply with the
conditions set out in the new rule, he or she would be permanently
ineligible for admission.
For more information, please contact:
Vishal
Trivedi
vishalt@gmhc.org
Immigration Project Manager
Gay Men’s Health Crisis, Legal Services
Department 119 W. 24th Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10011
USA
Nathan
Schaefer
nathans@gmhc.org Director of Public Policy
Department Gay Men's Health Crisis, Public Policy Department
119 W. 24th Street, 9th floor
New York, NY 10011-1913
USA
|
HIV Incidence
New technology and methodology developed by CDC show
that the incidence of HIV in the United States is higher than was previously
known. However, the incidence has been stable at that higher level for most
of this decade. HIV incidence is the number of new HIV infections occurring
during a certain time period, in this case, the year 2006.
HIV Incidence in the US
GMHC Statement on the President’s signing of
PEPFAR and the lift of the HIV entry ban:
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Krishna Stone, 212-367-1016
July 30, 2008
PRESIDENT BUSH LIFTS HIV ENTRY
BAN
Targets Global HIV Prevention towards
Gay and Bisexual men
New York—Today President Bush signed into law a
five-year authorization of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
(PEPFAR) that lifts the 15 year-old HIV entry ban and targets prevention
towards men who have sex with men (MSM). The legislation authorizes
$48 billion to be spent on foreign AIDS relief over the next five years.
Since 2003, PEPFAR has provided HIV medications to nearly two million
people, mostly in Africa.
Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC) applauds Congress and
the President for approvals of two specific provisions within PEPFAR.
The legislation removes the statutory ban on HIV-positive non-citizens
gaining immigration status and travel visas originally proposed by the late
Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC) and codified into law in 1993. The U.S. was
one among only 13 countries to ban short-term HIV-positive visitors.
Until the final call to pass the bill, conservative policymakers threatened
to propose amendments to strike the language that lifts the ban. The
decision to completely remove the ban now rests within the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS), as HIV remains on a list of “communicable
diseases of public health significance.”
“Today the United States rejoined the civilized world,
at least on this aspect of immigration policy,” said Marjorie J. Hill, PhD,
Chief Executive Officer of Gay Men’s Health Crisis. “We thank President Bush
and Congress, and especially Senators Kerry, Smith and Congresswoman Lee,
for their leadership. We call on HHS Secretary Leavitt to remove the
remaining regulatory barriers that prevent people living with HIV from
entering the United States.”
GMHC has been pushing to overturn the statutory ban for
more than a decade. Recently, GMHC convened the Coalition to Lift the
Bar and worked closely with Immigration Equality, AIDS Action Council, Human
Rights Campaign and other groups to repeal the HIV entry ban.
PEPFAR now includes provisions that require recipient
countries to conduct HIV-prevention programs for gay men and other men who
have sex with men (MSM), and report to the Office of the Global AIDS
Coordinator on progress with this implementation.
This unprecedented requirement will require address
health disparities of MSM in countries, many of which have anti-gay laws and
cultural practices. GMHC, along with AIDS Project Los Angeles and
other groups, led the fight for the MSM provisions.
“The passage of PEPFAR is a significant contribution in
the global fight against AIDS. It will provide treatment to millions of
impoverished HIV-positive children and families across the globe,” said Dr.
Hill. “Where this legislation fails is in the realm of HIV
prevention.”
The requirement remains that countries must spend 50
percent of their prevention funding on unproven
abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. Or they undergo burdensome
reporting to justify their programmatic decisions which could lead to
possible defunding. The legislation fails to support integration
between family planning services and HIV prevention/treatment programs for
vulnerable populations—women and youth. Lastly, countries still have
to oppose commercial sex work before receiving funding. Yet many
prevention programs for sex workers around the world have proven to
dramatically reduce HIV infection.
“Abstinence-only-until-marriage has been an abject
failure in the U.S. and it is undercutting the local, effective prevention
efforts in Africa and elsewhere,” added Dr. Hill.
###
Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC) is a not-for-profit,
volunteer-supported and community-based organization committed to national
leadership in the fight against AIDS. We provide services and programs to
over 15,000 men, women and families that are living with or affected by
HIV/AIDS in New York City, and outreach and education to hundreds of
thousands throughout the world.
For Immediate Release: Tuesday, July 22
Contact:
Julie Davids,
jdavids@champnetwork.org,
646-431-7525
Walt Senterfitt,
wsenterfit@aol.com, 323-683-0490
Kenyon Farrow,
kenyon@q4ej.org, 917.627.0853
U.S Presidential Candidates to
Face Scrutiny During International AIDS Conference As CDC Releases Figures
Showing Higher HIV Rates
AIDS community activists
demand that McCain, Obama denounce Bush failures, including lack of a
national AIDS strategy; cuts in HIV spending; and promotion of ineffective,
biased policies like abstinence-only programs
Tuesday, July 29, 2008: 1 – 2 pm EST
PRESS TELECONFERENCE:
Phone Number: 1-866-740-1260 Passcode 8220715#
On August 3 at the International AIDS Conference
(IAC) in Mexico City, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) will finally
release long-awaited revised incidence numbers, revealing that the
number of new cases in 2006 was not 40,000, but as high as 55,000. This
troubling news strengthens the resolve of AIDS activists who are demanding
that Senators McCain and Obama speak out against regressive HIV prevention
policies.
The IAC, the largest conference on HIV/AIDS in
the world, will happen in the absence of key CDC researchers, NIH scientists
and government public health officials, due to
a travel ban instigated by Senator Tom Coburn (R, OK), who replaced the
late Jesse Helms as a leading force of anti-gay and wrongheaded HIV/AIDS
policies in the Senate. Sen. McCain has referred to Coburn as
the person whose advice he seeks on HIV/AIDS issues, and Sen. Obama has
cited his work with Coburn
as an example of cross-party collaboration.
Sen. Coburn also seeks to put warning labels on
condoms, is a leading force in the gag rule blocking international
U.S.-funded programs from effective prevention efforts with sex workers, and
is responsible for ensuring that the recently reauthorized global AIDS bill
(PEPFAR) includes
ideological barriers to effective HIV prevention and
funding limitations
that will reduce the number of people with HIV accessing lifesaving
treatment.
Shortly after the conference,
the candidates will
both present at Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church in their first post-primary
co-appearance. Rev. Warren and his wife Kay have encouraged churches to
get involved with HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, but have embraced
anti-gay clergy (for example, the steering committee chair of their massive
Rwandan project is Archbishop Emmanuel Kolini, the Anglican leader who has
called on churches in the East African region to fight against homosexuality
for the
“good of the society,” and have been largely disengaged from the U.S
epidemic, in which most cases are in gay men, with the highest rates in
Black gay men.
“Those at the front line of HIV/AIDS in the
United States include people of faith of all sexual orientations who oppose
the inaccurate abstinence-only programs that have persisted even in a
Democratic-led Congress, and who understand the need for honest, accurate
HIV prevention for all people, including gay men, sex workers and youth,”
said Julie Davids, Executive Director of the Community HIV/AIDS Mobilization
Project (CHAMP).
“Now that we are confirming what we’ve long
suspected – HIV rates in the US are higher than previous government
statistics indicated -- we look to the presidential candidates to use the
International AIDS Conference and the Saddleback Church platform to
repudiate the policies of President Bush and Senator Coburn, and to show the
political leadership we need for a strong national AIDS strategy in which
science and justice will trump ideology and bias.”
Press teleconference to feature prominent
advocates living with HIV and other policy experts; speakers available for
interviews in advance. Issues to be covered include:
New Numbers on HIV in the US Are Neither
Pretty nor Petty: Understanding the Implications of the Incidence Estimate:
For years, there has been data showing the rise of HIV
infection rates in key communities, most dramatically in Black gay men. Now,
CDC is releasing data verifying that the long-held estimate of 40,000 new
infections a year is not accurate, according to a sophisticated sampling
procedure with thousands of HIV test results from more than 20 states. How
much can we glean from one year of the new estimate? What are the other data
to be discussed in Mexico City that will shed light on HIV/AIDS incidence in
the United States? And how could structural interventions confront incidence
by tackling underlying causes of racial disparities and high rates in gay
men, such as poverty, mass imprisonment, and overlapping epidemics of
violence and marginalization in gay men’s lives?
A Look at the Candidates on HIV/AIDS:
What do the
statements, candidate poll responses and congressional actions indicate
about how McCain or Obama would view his mandate as leader of the nation
that is both the largest investor in HIV/AIDS global programs and home to
one of the world’s most pervasive AIDS epidemics in our gay, Black and
Latino/a communities? Among other AIDS promises, Obama has pledged to
institute a National AIDS Strategy to mirror what we require from PEPFAR
recipients, but has remained largely mute on domestic AIDS in the news, on
the stump and the web. McCain has not released an HIV/AIDS platform and has
publicly deferred to Sen. Coburn on AIDS issues.
Who Won’t Be at the International AIDS
Conference – and Why it Matters: Next
week’s conference will lack high-ranking U.S. politicians as well as
hundreds of NIH, CDC and HHS scientist and policy-makers whose work is
integral to the struggle against HIV/AIDS. What are the implications of this
intellectual ban, how does it reflect larger Bush-era restrictions on
objectivity and science, and what should the next President do about it?
Why the Candidates Must Speak Against Sen.
Coburn’s Bush-Era Crusade Against Effective HIV/AIDS Policies:
Senator Coburn’s shock-fest “Revenge of the STDs” slide show
inflicted on Congressional staff and interns would be laughable if it were
not for his undue influence on real-world public health policies. His recent
actions to restrict PEPFAR will lead to more infections and less people on
treatment, and his intellectual ban on the International AIDS Conference
hampers key dialogue to move forward collaboration against the epidemic.
What are the concerns of AIDS advocates who see presidential candidates
referring to him as an expert on HIV/AIDS or as an example of
cross-the-aisle congressional deal-making?
# # #
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 16, 2008
U.S. Senate Approves Repeal of Discriminatory HIV Travel and Immigration Ban
Human Rights Campaign praises Senate for supporting repeal of draconian
policy
WASHINGTON - The Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay, lesbian,
bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, praised the U.S. Senate
today for approving the repeal of our nation's discriminatory law barring
HIV-positive visitors and immigrants. Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Gordon
Smith (R-OR) secured a provision to repeal this ban in the Senate's
legislation to reauthorize PEPFAR, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief. The PEPFAR bill passed the Senate today with the Kerry-Smith
provision by a vote of 80 to 16 and now moves to conference committee before
being sent to the President.
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) had introduced an amendment to strike the
Kerry-Smith provision from the PEFPAR bill. However, the efforts of
Senators Kerry and Smith in addition to robust advocacy from HRC and our
coalition partners secured enough opposition to the Sessions amendment that
the Senator agreed not to bring it forward for a vote.
"We applaud the Senate for rejecting this unjust and sweeping policy that
deems HIV-positive individuals inadmissible to the United States," said
Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "We call on the leaders of
the House and Senate to retain the Kerry-Smith provision in conference and
ensure it is included in the final legislation sent to the President's
desk."
"The HIV ban is ineffective, unnecessary, and simply bad public health
policy," said Rachel B. Tiven, executive director of Immigration Equality.
"It is especially harmful to gay and lesbian families, who do not benefit
from the waiver available to opposite-sex couples. The Senate's change is
welcome, and long overdue."
HRC has been a lead organization lobbying on Capitol Hill for the repeal.
The Human Rights Campaign has worked closely with the offices of Sens. John
Kerry and Gordon Smith, as well as Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), the sponsor of
an effort to repeal the ban in the House of Representatives. Both Sen.
Kerry and Rep. Lee participated in a national media conference call held by
HRC in March. In addition to action alerts urging members to contact their
Senators, HRC and Immigration Equality drafted a coalition letter on behalf
of more than 165 organizations in support of the Kerry-Smith provision in
the PEPFAR bill, and has directly lobbied numerous Senate offices on the
repeal measure.
In December of 2007, Senators Kerry and Smith introduced legislation, the
HIV Non-Discrimination in Travel and Immigration Act (S. 2486), to repeal
the ban. In the House, U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) introduced similar the
legislation, H.R. 3337, in August 2007. The travel and immigration ban
prohibits HIV-positive foreign nationals from entering the U.S. unless they
obtain a special waiver, which can only allow for short-term travel.
Current policy also prevents the vast majority of foreign nationals with HIV
from obtaining legal permanent residency in the United States.
The ban originated in 1987, and explicitly codified by Congress in 1993,
despite efforts in the public health community to remove the ban when
Congress reformed U.S. immigration law in the early 1990s. While
immigration law currently excludes foreigners with any "communicable disease
of public health significance" from entering the U.S., only HIV is
explicitly named in the statute. For all other illnesses, the Secretary of
Health and Human Services retains the ability, with the medical expertise of
his department, to determine which illnesses truly pose a risk to public
health.
The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest civil rights organization
working to achieve gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender equality. By
inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination
against GLBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental
fairness and equality for all.
Gays excluded from HIV work in Uganda
By Staff Writer, PinkNews.co.uk • June 2, 2008 - 13:41
Genesis of a Virus
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
The California Supreme Court's Ruling
POSTED: 10:04 am PDT May 15, 2008
UPDATED: 12:31 pm PDT May 15, 2008
Panel discussion with Dr. Conant
On Sunday, April 27 Dr. Conant will be participating in a panel
discussion following the world premiere of the play MonkeyRoom.
The discussion will focus on key issues addressed by the play,
primarily the research and development of an AIDS vaccine. Along with
Dr. Conant, other panelists include Warner C. Greene and Beth
Seidenberg. The proceedings will be moderated by Bruce Jenett. If
you have any interest in seeing the play and/or discussion, please go to
http://www.theatermania.com/content/show.cfm/show/142668 for more
information.
For a review of the play in the SF Chronicle go to:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/04/14/DDNK1025A7.DTL&type=printable
‘Eww’ factor aside, anal HPV infection is a risk
It's as common as infections that cause cervical cancer, study says
April. 11, 2008 MSNBC
Hepatitis C deaths soar by 123 percent
New report finds deaths related to the infection skyrocketed
from '95 to '04
April. 10, 2008 MSNBC
Paper
Screening for genital and anorectal sexually transmitted infections in
HIV prevention trials in Africa published online March 28, 2008
|

|
Abstract
|
Objectives:
Our objectives were (1) to demonstrate the value of routine,
basic sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening at
enrolment into an
HIV-1
vaccine feasibility cohort study; and (2) to highlight the
importance of soliciting a history of receptive anal
intercourse (RAI) in adults identified as high risk.
Methods:
Routine STI screening was offered to adults at high risk for
HIV-1
upon enrolment into a cohort study in preparation for
HIV-1
vaccine trials. Risk behaviors and STI prevalence were
summarized, and the value of microscopy assessed.
Associations between prevalent
HIV-1
infection and RAI or prevalent STIs were evaluated with multiple
logistic regression.
Results:
Participants had a high burden of untreated STIs.
Symptom-directed management would have missed 67% of
urethritis cases in men and 59% of cervicitis cases in women.
RAI was reported by 36% of male and 18% of female participants.
RAI was strongly associated with
HIV-1
in men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.8, 95% CI 2.0-V 6.9),
and independently associated with syphilis in women (aOR
12.9, 95% CI 3.4-V 48.7).
Conclusions:
High-risk adults recruited for
HIV-1
prevention trials carry a high STI burden. Symptom-directed
treatment may miss many cases, and simple laboratory-based
screening can be done with little cost. Risk assessment
should include questions about anal intercourse and whether
condoms were used. STI screening, including specific
assessment for anorectal disease, should be offered in
African research settings recruiting participants at high
risk for
HIV-1
acquisition.
To read the full text of the study, please click
here.
|

|
3/31/2008
Marcus Conant
Physician; Medical Director, Presidio Pharmaceuticals; Chairman,
The Conant Foundation
Why has AIDS not exploded in the heterosexual community during
the last 25 years? What should we expect of AIDS rates among
heterosexuals in the future? Since before AIDS had a name,
Conant has been a leading clinician, researcher and advocate in
this field. Come listen to this important discussion that could
save your life or that of a loved one.
MLF: LGBT
Location: Club Office
Time: 5:30 p.m. reception,
6 p.m. program
Cost: MEMBERS FREE, $15 non-members
Program Organizer: Stephen Seewer
Get tickets now!
|
Insight into HIV's 'on-off' switch shows promise for therapy, understanding cellular decisions
March 16, 2008
One in 4 Teen Girls Has a Sexually Transmitted Disease
Greatest burden falls on African-American adolescents, CDC researchers
find
By Steven Reinberg
Posted 3/11/08
MRSA Action Group March 10, 2008 / FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Full Text is shown below.
Gay Syphilis Surge in 2007
02/27/2008
Rectal Microbicide Advocates Call For 5x Funding Increase
February 25, 2008
Married to HIV
Microbicide gel passes safety test
Growth hormone enhances thymic function in HIV-1–infected adults
The Journal of Clinical
Investigation
http://www.jci.org Volume 118 Number 3 March 2008
Novel mathematical model predicts new wave of drug-resistant HIV infections in San Francisco
Public release date: 17-Feb-2008
HIV vaccine may never be found, warns leading scientist
February 14, 2008
'Unacceptable' delay in detecting Brazil AIDS cases: official
Feb 14
Number of US primary care doctors down
Tue Feb 12
Antiretroviral Drugs Could Be Used To Prevent HIV Transmission, Study Says
[Feb 07, 2008]
Increased Risk of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Abacavir and ddI
February 4, 2008
Male Circumcision No Aid to Women in Study
February 4, 2008
San Francisco Chronical - Opinion PRIMARY VIEWS Marcus A. Conant
Candidate: Barack Obama
February 3, 2008
Fight Looms Over Global AIDS Program
02 February 2008
Scientists study how HIV hides in body
Fri Feb 1, 3:59 PM PST
Pfizer To License Antiretroviral To IPM for Reformulation as Microbicide
[Jan 30, 2008]
Self-Medicating With AIDS Drugs
Jan. 28, 2008
FDA Approves Tibotec Therapeutics's INTELENCE(TM) (etravirine) for HIV Combination Therapy
1/21/2008
After Linking New Strain of Staph to Gay Men, University Scrambles to Clarify
January 20, 2008
Virus Is Linked to a Powerful Skin Cancer
1/18/2008
Dallas scientists stop HIV from spreading in mice
January 15, 2008
Drug-resistant staph found to be passed in gay sex
Jan 14, 2008
MSM in Kenya urgently require targeted HIV prevention
January 11, 2008
Iraq Casualties Tested for HIV
11 January 2008
AIDS researchers find protein that greatly boosts HIV infection
December 14, 2007
New Rules for HIV-Positive People Visiting U.S. More Restrictive Than Old Regulations, Critics Say
[Dec 06, 2007]
AIDS Activists Say U.S. Delays Infection Data Release
December 3, 2007 14:59 EST
Estimate of AIDS Cases In U.S. Rises
December 1, 2007
MRSA Action Group March 10, 2008 / FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
If Gay Sex is So Unhealthy, Why are There So Many Healthy Gay Men?
A Response to the Chronicle’s
MRSA Story
This last January the
Chronicle sparked a global disease scare about an aggressive
strain of staph. A new epidemic was rumored to be headquartered in
San Francisco’s gay population. The
Chronicle reported the
virulent strain "on the loose", "resistant to antibiotics" and
headed directly toward America's sacred family value system--you
know, the whole "general population" thing.
Anyone tired of that story line?
As reported, this bad bug was sure to get you, especially if you
lived within local zip codes. The
Chronicle may as well have
dubbed it San Francisco's "Zip Code Disease".
Laughing matter or not, there are serious scientific errors in the
article, especially relevant for gay men. Errors which have been
followed by tsunami after tsunami of the ugliest anti-gay defamation
not heard since the early days of the HIV epidemic. The following
are typical of public postings found on the web within days of the
Chronicle story:
..."Homosexuals should be quarantined to protect society from this
plague"... ..."San Fran has to be nuked, save the world before it
spreads"...
..."It's called butt fucking, if you don't do it you don't have to
worry!"... ... Staff (sic) infection is epidemic in the gay business
community"...
..."According to the article all they have to do is shower after
they butt fuck and they won't get it, this is why I don't like
shaking gay's hands"...
..."It's the bisexuals that spread it all over the place"...
..."Not just the bisexuals... some of the sickest homosexuals will
engage in sex with women solely to spread their filthy diseases to
heterosexuals"...
In the general population, the public education campaign had begun.
Imagine for a moment how you might feel trying to heal from a new
mystery contagion in the context of the cultural war games of the
"Concerned Women for America" who took the occasion to characterize
"homosexual conduct" as "a breeding ground for the often deadly
disease".
Imagine for a moment you are a guy like Todd M., a member of our group and a gay man who was kind
enough to visit an ailing
friend in the hospital. A few days later, he came down with a MRSA
infection. His infection quickly became severe, painful and
difficult to treat, with repeated courses of antibiotics and
-repeated outbreaks of MRSA for years. He soon overextended his sick
days and lost his job. Then, without income he soon began missing
his rent, was evicted from his apartment, and now knows the depth of
trauma you can encounter in our broken health care system.
What Todd needs is an angel or a group of angels to provide a
shelter in the storm, not defame him when he is ill. Global
experience in the HIV epidemic has shown what works for someone like
Todd is to connect with
people of compassion and courage--people who can deal skillfully
when insults are heaped upon naturally occurring injury.
Hey Chron, You're Getting Under My Skin-
The Chronicle article
gave the reader five false impressions:
1. MRSA disease is new.
2. San Francisco is the epicenter of MRSA.
3. The MRSA epidemic is associated with gay men.
4. MRSA is transmitted by gay sex.
5. MRSA is the New AIDS.
Not one of these impressions is true.
1. MRSA disease is NOT new.
MRSA has been around for years and is an equal opportunity
infection that affects everyone.
Anyone can find the evidence.
In Feb. of this year a UK journal
The Observer reported the aggressive strain of staph USA300 to be
"already epidemic in the US" and to be in nine European countries as
well as England and Wales. The Brits are way ahead of the USA on
staph and find it mostly in hospitals there.
MRSA disease occurs throughout the world.
Check it out --- Google key words "MRSA""UK" and you will get
2,220,000 web sites to help you deal with education, prevention,
support groups, treatment and everything else including natural
treatments.
Two months ago a form of MRSA USA300 killed four children in
Louisiana and Georgia. Did you hear an alarm bell sounding in the
Chron about a "New Killer Plague Emerging from the Bible Belt"?
In August of 2007 Lisa Rosetta of the Salt Lake Tribune reported
"4,904 cases of MRSA in Utah, making it the second most common
reportable communicable disease". Ever read a front page story about
"Mormon capital an epicenter for virulent disease"?
You have to wonder what would have happened at the
Chron if someone
mistakenly ran that story.
Additionally USA300 has been found for years among pro football
players and college sports teams. Ever read a splashy story in the
sports section about a "Super Bowl of Infection"?
So now that a handful of gay men here get an infection you have to
wonder who decided that it was time for the
Chron to decontexualize a
global health concern by running a front page story like "S.F. Gay
Community an Epicenter for a New Strain of Virulent Staph"???
What were they thinking?
2. San Francisco is not the epicenter of MRSA. Around the world
there is no one epicenter of MRSA.
3. MRSA is not unique to gay men.
After the Chronicle story
the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta felt
it necessary to reassure the public. Their response: "These
infections occur in men, women, adults, children and persons of all
races and sexual orientations."
4. MRSA is not a sexually transmitted disease. MRSA is and can be
transmitted by sex, gay or not—just like a common cold. Sex is not
the primary mode of transmission.
All varieties of staph infection can be transmitted by sexual
contact since staph is transmitted by skin to skin contact. The UCSF
study quoted by the Chron clearly states:
"Specific sexual behaviors were not assessed or documented in
clinic charts; we therefore cannot comment on the association
between multidrug-resistant USA300 infection and specific male-male
sexual practices."
5. MRSA is not the New AIDS.
Worldwide media picked up the Chronicle story and ran with it,
multiplying the effect of the errors and creating panic. After a
London Tabloid dubbed MRSA "The New AIDS", Newsweek magazine asked
Dr. Henry Chambers, the coauthor of the UCSF study, if "there is a
new HIV-like public health epidemic on the horizon?" He replied
"This is definitely NOT the new AIDS."
NOT ONE of the five impressions Equating gay men with contagion
created by the Chronicle is true!
So what's going on at the Chron?
Is this whole mess due to ignorance, laziness, bone headed malice
or mischievous intention?
Who's responsible and who's in charge?
And most important what is the Chron going to do about it and when?
UCSF's Department of Public Affairs has already stepped up to the
plate and offered an apology deploring the "negative targeting of
specific populations in association with MRSA infections o, other
public health concerns". The New York Times has also apologized for
inaccuracies in its coverage. At this time no gay community
representatives have officially accepted either of the above
apologies.
|