Conant Foundation     THE CONANT FOUNDATION
           
  Skip Navigation Links
Home
News
Medical News
Research
Expand Research
Lectures
Expand Lectures
About Us
Board of Directors
Expand Board of Directors
Care and Treatment
Sculptra® For Lipodystrophy
Epidemiology
AIDS History in San Francisco
Advocacy
Expand Advocacy
Recent Accomplishments
Links and Resources
Newsletter
Expand Newsletter
Contact Us
Search The Website
   

News

 

HPV vaccine can prevent genital warts in men

Article  


 

Researchers Identify Novel Type of Antibody that Potently Inhibits HIV Infection

A small antibody fragment that is highly effective in neutralizing the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by preventing the virus from entering cells has been identified by researchers at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This finding may provide insight into the development of new treatments against HIV and other viruses, hopefully in the not too distant future. The study appears online Oct. 20, 2008, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)  


 

 

New CDC/HHS rule on HIV as communicable disease in immigration:

 

You recall on Sept 30, Dept of Homeland Security reached its unfortunate decision on visa waivers for HIV positive individuals, rejecting most of the overwhelming comments it received and maintaining its burdensome and discriminatory visa policy. DHS justified the action in part by saying this "interim measure" awaits HHS' removing HIV soon from the list of communicable diseases for purposes of immigration. On Oct 6 in the Washington Post CDC director Julie Gerberding defended that view. However, on the very same day, Oct 6, HHS/CDC published the attached interim and proposed rule revising the list of communicable diseases with time for comment- reiterating that HIV is an important part of the list and remaining so. The Oct 6 rule revises requirements to add other diseases to the list of communicable diseases as grounds for inadmissibility. It makes no nod to the issue of removing HIV from the list despite the rationale it uses that the current regulations "are outdated' and "no longer in keeping with current medical knowledge." It repeats that it supports all diseases on the list, including HIV, because of its view of risks to the population and costs. Although this rule is not the promised proposal to remove HIV that CDC has stated it intends to consider, it is still another kick in the shins of failing to do more than just talk. Comments on this interim rule allowed till December 5.

Text of the interim rule

 


 

Study traces AIDS virus origin to 100 years ago

 

By MALCOLM RITTER, AP Science Writer Wed Oct 1, 3:35 PM ET

 

NEW YORK - The AIDS virus has been circulating among people for about 100 years, decades longer than scientists had thought, a new study suggests. Genetic analysis pushes the estimated origin of HIV back to between 1884 and 1924, with a more focused estimate at 1908.

Previously, scientists had estimated the origin at around 1930. AIDS wasn't recognized formally until 1981 when it got the attention of public health officials in the United States.

The new result is "not a monumental shift, but it means the virus was circulating under our radar even longer than we knew," says Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona, an author of the new work.

The results appear in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature. Researchers note that the newly calculated dates fall during the rise of cities in Africa, and they suggest urban development may have promoted HIV's initial establishment and early spread.

Scientists say HIV descended from a chimpanzee virus that jumped to humans in Africa, probably when people butchered chimps. Many individuals were probably infected that way, but so few other people caught the virus that it failed to get a lasting foothold, researchers say.

But the growth of African cities may have changed that by putting lots of people close together and promoting prostitution, Worobey suggested. "Cities are kind of ideal for a virus like HIV," providing more chances for infected people to pass the virus to others, he said.

Perhaps a person infected with the AIDS virus in a rural area went to what is now Kinshasa, Congo, "and now you've got the spark arriving in the tinderbox," Worobey said.

Key to the new work was the discovery of an HIV sample that had been taken from a woman in Kinshasa in 1960. It was only the second such sample to be found from before 1976; the other was from 1959, also from Kinshasa.

Researchers took advantage of the fact that HIV mutates rapidly. So two strains from a common ancestor quickly become less and less alike in their genetic material over time. That allows scientists to "run the clock backward" by calculating how long it would take for various strains to become as different as they are observed to be. That would indicate when they both sprang from their most recent common ancestor.

The new work used genetic data from the two old HIV samples plus more than 100 modern samples to create a family tree going back to these samples' last common ancestor. Researchers got various answers under various approaches for when that ancestor virus appeared, but the 1884-to-1924 bracket is probably the most reliable, Worobey said.

The new work is "clearly an improvement" over the previous estimate of around 1930, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Md. His institute helped pay for the work.

Fauci described the advance as "a fine-tuning."

Experts say it's no surprise that HIV circulated in humans for about 70 years before being recognized. An infection usually takes years to produce obvious symptoms, a lag that can mask the role of the virus, and it would have infected relatively few Africans early in its spread, they said.

 


 

Final Rule on Issuance of a Visa and Authorization for
Temporary Admission into the United States for Non-
Immigrants (Temporary Travelers into the United
States) with HIV.

On December 1, 2006 (World AIDS Day) the White House announced that the President would “direct the Secretary of State to request and the Secretary of Homeland Security to initiate a rulemaking that would propose a categorical waiver for HIV-positive people seeking to enter the United States on short-term visas.”

On September 29, 2008 the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule for a streamlined process for HIV-positive people to enter the United States.

The basics:

The final rule does not create a new regulatory scheme that would permit HIV- positive persons to enter the United States temporarily nor does it change the law for HIV+ immigrants already in the U.S., most of whom are barred from attaining legal status except in extremely limited circumstances.

HIV-positive immigrants would still be inadmissible under the new rule and subject to the 2 12(g) waiver requirements, including the need for a qualifying family member, private health insurance, etc.1

Under the new rule HIV-positive travelers seeking a waiver would be limited to admission on a B-1 (entering for a short business related reason) or B-2 visa (visitors for pleasure) for visits of 30 days or less. However, under the new rule, they would be able to apply for a waiver to allow them admission into the United States without prior approval

1 On July 30, 2008, the President signed into law the Tom Lantos and Henry J. Hyde United States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008,

Public Law No. 110-293. Section 305 of P.L. 110-293 amends section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) so that HHS is no longer required to designate HIV infection as a communicable disease of public health significance.” However the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has not amended 42 CFR 34.2(b) to remove HIV infection from the list of diseases that qualify

as a “communicable disease of public health significance.” Until HHS does amend 42 CFR 34.2(b) HIV-positive individuals will continue to be inadmissible under 212(a)( 1)(A)(i) of the INA.


by the Secretary of Homeland Security. In other words, the determination on their application could be made at the consular officer level in their home countries rather than by the Department of Homeland Security. The “visa stamp” would be valid for 12 months or less; and the traveler would be allowed into the U.S. for 2 “visits” not to exceed 30 days. Waiver applicants would still be allowed to apply under the current system, i.e., through DHS.

Criteria for entry:

In general: Any person who is inadmissible under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(i) of the INA due to HIV infection may be issued a B-1 (business visitor) or B-2 (visitor for pleasure) nonimmigrant visa by a consular officer or the Secretary of State, and may be admitted to the United States for a period not to exceed 30 days, provided that:

·           The applicant has tested positive for HIV.

·           Controlled state of HIV: The applicant needs to demonstrate that they are asymptomatic.

·           Evidence: An applicant must prove he or she has been counseled on, and understands the nature, severity and the communicability of his or her medical condition. The applicant must also provide the consular officer with evidence that (a) the danger to the public health is minimal; (b) the possibility of transmission of HIV is minimal; (c) no cost will accrue to any government agency without prior consent.

·           Drug supply: Under this final rule, applicants would have to establish that they have in their possession or will have access to an adequate supply of antiretrovirals (ARVs) to last for the duration of their trip to the United States.

·           Assets:  Applicants would also have to prove they have sufficient assets (such as insurance) to cover any medical care they may need while in the United States.

·           Inadmissibility pursuant to the Visa Waiver Program: The Visa Waiver Program allows travelers from certain countries to enter the U.S. without a visa provided they are not “inadmissible.” HIV-positive travelers from these countries are considered “inadmissible” and have always been required to get a visa. This new rule upholds and makes explicit their inadmissibility under the Visa Waiver Program.

·           Extension of stay and/or change in status: Under the new rule, waiver applicants would be required to forgo the opportunity to apply for an extension of their stay, a change in nonimmigrant status, or an adjustment of status to that of permanent resident. This means:


1. Travelers would only be permitted to extend their stays in the U.S. beyond 30 days if they demonstrate exigent circumstances should the need arise.

2. Should an applicant have the opportunity to apply for a work visa, they would have to return home to do so.

3. Applicants would not be allowed to apply for a green card within the United States if they entered pursuant to this waiver.

Failure to comply:

If a traveler does not comply with the conditions set out in the new rule, he or she would be permanently ineligible for admission.

For more information, please contact:

Vishal Trivedi vishalt@gmhc.org

Immigration Project Manager

Gay Men’s Health Crisis, Legal Services Department 119 W. 24th Street, 7th Floor

New York, NY 10011

USA

Nathan Schaefer nathans@gmhc.org  Director of Public Policy Department Gay Men's Health Crisis, Public Policy Department

119 W. 24th Street, 9th floor

New York, NY 10011-1913

USA


 

HIV Incidence

New technology and methodology developed by CDC show that the incidence of HIV in the United States is higher than was previously known. However, the incidence has been stable at that higher level for most of this decade. HIV incidence is the number of new HIV infections occurring during a certain time period, in this case, the year 2006.

HIV Incidence in the US

 


 

 

GMHC Statement on the President’s signing of PEPFAR and the lift of the HIV entry ban:

For Immediate Release                                   Contact:            Krishna Stone, 212-367-1016

July 30, 2008

                                   

PRESIDENT BUSH LIFTS HIV ENTRY BAN 

Targets Global HIV Prevention towards Gay and Bisexual men

 

New York—Today President Bush signed into law a five-year authorization of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) that lifts the 15 year-old HIV entry ban and targets prevention towards men who have sex with men (MSM).  The legislation authorizes $48 billion to be spent on foreign AIDS relief over the next five years.  Since 2003, PEPFAR has provided HIV medications to nearly two million people, mostly in Africa. 

 

Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC) applauds Congress and the President for approvals of two specific provisions within PEPFAR.  The legislation removes the statutory ban on HIV-positive non-citizens gaining immigration status and travel visas originally proposed by the late Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC) and codified into law in 1993.  The U.S. was one among only 13 countries to ban short-term HIV-positive visitors.  Until the final call to pass the bill, conservative policymakers threatened to propose amendments to strike the language that lifts the ban. The decision to completely remove the ban now rests within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), as HIV remains on a list of “communicable diseases of public health significance.”

 

“Today the United States rejoined the civilized world, at least on this aspect of immigration policy,” said Marjorie J. Hill, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Gay Men’s Health Crisis. “We thank President Bush and Congress, and especially Senators Kerry, Smith and Congresswoman Lee, for their leadership. We call on HHS Secretary Leavitt to remove the remaining regulatory barriers that prevent people living with HIV from entering the United States.”

 

GMHC has been pushing to overturn the statutory ban for more than a decade.  Recently, GMHC convened the Coalition to Lift the Bar and worked closely with Immigration Equality, AIDS Action Council, Human Rights Campaign and other groups to repeal the HIV entry ban.

 

PEPFAR now includes provisions that require recipient countries to conduct HIV-prevention programs for gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM), and report to the Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator on progress with this implementation. 

 

This unprecedented requirement will require address health disparities of MSM in countries, many of which have anti-gay laws and cultural practices.  GMHC, along with AIDS Project Los Angeles and other groups, led the fight for the MSM provisions. 

 

“The passage of PEPFAR is a significant contribution in the global fight against AIDS. It will provide treatment to millions of impoverished HIV-positive children and families across the globe,” said Dr. Hill.  “Where this legislation fails is in the realm of HIV prevention.”  

 

The requirement remains that countries must spend 50 percent of their prevention funding on unproven abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.  Or they undergo burdensome reporting to justify their programmatic decisions which could lead to possible defunding.  The legislation fails to support integration between family planning services and HIV prevention/treatment programs for vulnerable populations—women and youth.  Lastly, countries still have to oppose commercial sex work before receiving funding.  Yet many prevention programs for sex workers around the world have proven to dramatically reduce HIV infection.

 

“Abstinence-only-until-marriage has been an abject failure in the U.S. and it is undercutting the local, effective prevention efforts in Africa and elsewhere,” added Dr. Hill.

###

 

Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC) is a not-for-profit, volunteer-supported and community-based organization committed to national leadership in the fight against AIDS. We provide services and programs to over 15,000 men, women and families that are living with or affected by HIV/AIDS in New York City, and outreach and education to hundreds of thousands throughout the world.

 


 

 

For Immediate Release: Tuesday, July 22

 

 

 

Contact:      

Julie Davids, jdavids@champnetwork.org, 646-431-7525

Walt Senterfitt, wsenterfit@aol.com, 323-683-0490

Kenyon Farrow, kenyon@q4ej.org, 917.627.0853

 

U.S Presidential Candidates to Face Scrutiny During International AIDS Conference As CDC Releases Figures Showing Higher HIV Rates

 

AIDS community activists demand that McCain, Obama denounce Bush failures, including lack of a national AIDS strategy; cuts in HIV spending; and promotion of ineffective, biased policies like abstinence-only programs

 

Tuesday, July 29, 2008: 1 – 2 pm EST

PRESS TELECONFERENCE:

Phone Number: 1-866-740-1260 Passcode 8220715#

 

On August 3 at the International AIDS Conference (IAC) in Mexico City, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will finally release long-awaited revised incidence numbers, revealing that the number of new cases in 2006 was not 40,000, but as high as 55,000. This troubling news strengthens the resolve of AIDS activists who are demanding that Senators McCain and Obama speak out against regressive HIV prevention policies.

 

The IAC, the largest conference on HIV/AIDS in the world, will happen in the absence of key CDC researchers, NIH scientists and government public health officials, due to a travel ban instigated by Senator Tom Coburn (R, OK), who replaced the late Jesse Helms as a leading force of anti-gay and wrongheaded HIV/AIDS policies in the Senate. Sen. McCain has referred to Coburn as the person whose advice he seeks on HIV/AIDS issues, and Sen. Obama has cited his work with Coburn as an example of cross-party collaboration.

 

Sen. Coburn also seeks to put warning labels on condoms, is a leading force in the gag rule blocking international U.S.-funded programs from effective prevention efforts with sex workers, and is responsible for ensuring that the recently reauthorized global AIDS bill (PEPFAR) includes ideological barriers to effective HIV prevention and funding limitations that will reduce the number of people with HIV accessing lifesaving treatment.

 

Shortly after the conference, the candidates will both present at Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church in their first post-primary co-appearance. Rev. Warren and his wife Kay have encouraged churches to get involved with HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, but have embraced anti-gay clergy (for example, the steering committee chair of their massive Rwandan project is Archbishop Emmanuel Kolini, the Anglican leader who has called on churches in the East African region to fight against homosexuality for the “good of the society,” and have been largely disengaged from the U.S epidemic, in which most cases are in gay men, with the highest rates in Black gay men.

 

 “Those at the front line of HIV/AIDS in the United States include people of faith of all sexual orientations who oppose the inaccurate abstinence-only programs that have persisted even in a Democratic-led Congress, and who understand the need for honest, accurate HIV prevention for all people, including gay men, sex workers and youth,” said Julie Davids, Executive Director of the Community HIV/AIDS Mobilization Project (CHAMP).

 

“Now that we are confirming what we’ve long suspected – HIV rates in the US are higher than previous government statistics indicated -- we look to the presidential candidates to use the International AIDS Conference and the Saddleback Church platform to repudiate the policies of President Bush and Senator Coburn, and to show the political leadership we need for a strong national AIDS strategy in which science and justice will trump ideology and bias.”

 

Press teleconference to feature prominent advocates living with HIV and other policy experts; speakers available for interviews in advance. Issues to be covered include:

 

New Numbers on HIV in the US Are Neither Pretty nor Petty: Understanding the Implications of the Incidence Estimate: For years, there has been data showing the rise of HIV infection rates in key communities, most dramatically in Black gay men. Now, CDC is releasing data verifying that the long-held estimate of 40,000 new infections a year is not accurate, according to a sophisticated sampling procedure with thousands of HIV test results from more than 20 states. How much can we glean from one year of the new estimate? What are the other data to be discussed in Mexico City that will shed light on HIV/AIDS incidence in the United States? And how could structural interventions confront incidence by tackling underlying causes of racial disparities and high rates in gay men, such as poverty, mass imprisonment, and overlapping epidemics of violence and marginalization in gay men’s lives?

 

A Look at the Candidates on HIV/AIDS:  What do the statements, candidate poll responses and congressional actions indicate about how McCain or Obama would view his mandate as leader of the nation that is both the largest investor in HIV/AIDS global programs and home to one of the world’s most pervasive AIDS epidemics in our gay, Black and Latino/a communities? Among other AIDS promises, Obama has pledged to institute a National AIDS Strategy to mirror what we require from PEPFAR recipients, but has remained largely mute on domestic AIDS in the news, on the stump and the web. McCain has not released an HIV/AIDS platform and has publicly deferred to Sen. Coburn on AIDS issues.

 

Who Won’t Be at the International AIDS Conference – and Why it Matters: Next week’s conference will lack high-ranking U.S. politicians as well as hundreds of NIH, CDC and HHS scientist and policy-makers whose work is integral to the struggle against HIV/AIDS. What are the implications of this intellectual ban, how does it reflect larger Bush-era restrictions on objectivity and science, and what should the next President do about it?

 

Why the Candidates Must Speak Against Sen. Coburn’s Bush-Era Crusade Against Effective HIV/AIDS Policies: Senator Coburn’s shock-fest “Revenge of the STDs” slide show inflicted on Congressional staff and interns would be laughable if it were not for his undue influence on real-world public health policies. His recent actions to restrict PEPFAR will lead to more infections and less people on treatment, and his intellectual ban on the International AIDS Conference hampers key dialogue to move forward collaboration against the epidemic. What are the concerns of AIDS advocates who see presidential candidates referring to him as an expert on HIV/AIDS or as an example of cross-the-aisle congressional deal-making?

# # #

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  July 16, 2008

U.S. Senate Approves Repeal of Discriminatory HIV Travel and Immigration Ban

Human Rights Campaign praises Senate for supporting repeal of draconian policy

WASHINGTON - The Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, praised the U.S. Senate today for approving the repeal of our nation's discriminatory law barring HIV-positive visitors and immigrants.  Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Gordon Smith (R-OR) secured a provision to repeal this ban in the Senate's legislation to reauthorize PEPFAR, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.  The PEPFAR bill passed the Senate today with the Kerry-Smith provision by a vote of 80 to 16 and now moves to conference committee before being sent to the President.

Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) had introduced an amendment to strike the Kerry-Smith provision from the PEFPAR bill.  However, the efforts of Senators Kerry and Smith in addition to robust advocacy from HRC and our coalition partners secured enough opposition to the Sessions amendment that the Senator agreed not to bring it forward for a vote.

"We applaud the Senate for rejecting this unjust and sweeping policy that deems HIV-positive individuals inadmissible to the United States," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.  "We call on the leaders of the House and Senate to retain the Kerry-Smith provision in conference and ensure it is included in the final legislation sent to the President's desk."

"The HIV ban is ineffective, unnecessary, and simply bad public health policy," said Rachel B. Tiven, executive director of Immigration Equality.  "It is especially harmful to gay and lesbian families, who do not benefit from the waiver available to opposite-sex couples.  The Senate's change is welcome, and long overdue."

HRC has been a lead organization lobbying on Capitol Hill for the repeal.  The Human Rights Campaign has worked closely with the offices of Sens. John Kerry and Gordon Smith, as well as Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), the sponsor of an effort to repeal the ban in the House of Representatives.  Both Sen. Kerry and Rep. Lee participated in a national media conference call held by HRC in March.  In addition to action alerts urging members to contact their Senators, HRC and Immigration Equality drafted a coalition letter on behalf of more than 165 organizations in support of the Kerry-Smith provision in the PEPFAR bill, and has directly lobbied numerous Senate offices on the repeal measure.

In December of 2007, Senators Kerry and Smith introduced legislation, the HIV Non-Discrimination in Travel and Immigration Act (S. 2486), to repeal the ban.  In the House, U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) introduced similar the legislation, H.R. 3337, in August 2007.  The travel and immigration ban prohibits HIV-positive foreign nationals from entering the U.S. unless they obtain a special waiver, which can only allow for short-term travel.  Current policy also prevents the vast majority of foreign nationals with HIV from obtaining legal permanent residency in the United States.

The ban originated in 1987, and explicitly codified by Congress in 1993, despite efforts in the public health community to remove the ban when Congress reformed U.S. immigration law in the early 1990s.  While immigration law currently excludes foreigners with any "communicable disease of public health significance" from entering the U.S., only HIV is explicitly named in the statute.  For all other illnesses, the Secretary of Health and Human Services retains the ability, with the medical expertise of his department, to determine which illnesses truly pose a risk to public health.

The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest civil rights organization working to achieve gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against GLBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.

 Gays excluded from HIV work in Uganda

By Staff Writer, PinkNews.co.uk • June 2, 2008 - 13:41

 



Genesis of a Virus
Wednesday, May 28, 2008





California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban

The California Supreme Court's Ruling

POSTED: 10:04 am PDT May 15, 2008
UPDATED: 12:31 pm PDT May 15, 2008




Panel discussion with Dr. Conant

On Sunday, April 27 Dr. Conant will be participating in a panel discussion following the world premiere of the play MonkeyRoom.  The discussion will focus on key issues addressed by the play, primarily the research and development of an AIDS vaccine.  Along with Dr. Conant, other panelists include Warner C. Greene and Beth Seidenberg.  The proceedings will be moderated by Bruce Jenett.  If you have any interest in seeing the play and/or discussion, please go to http://www.theatermania.com/content/show.cfm/show/142668 for more information.

For a review of the play in the SF Chronicle go to:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/04/14/DDNK1025A7.DTL&type=printable




‘Eww’ factor aside, anal HPV infection is a risk  

It's as common as infections that cause cervical cancer, study says

April. 11, 2008 MSNBC




Hepatitis C deaths soar by 123 percent  
New report finds deaths related to the infection skyrocketed from '95 to '04
April. 10, 2008 MSNBC



Paper

Screening for genital and anorectal sexually transmitted infections in HIV prevention trials in Africa published online March 28, 2008

*

   Abstract

Objectives: Our objectives were (1) to demonstrate the value of routine, basic sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening at enrolment into an HIV-1 vaccine feasibility cohort study; and (2) to highlight the importance of soliciting a history of receptive anal intercourse (RAI) in adults identified as high risk.
Methods: Routine STI screening was offered to adults at high risk for HIV-1 upon enrolment into a cohort study in preparation for HIV-1 vaccine trials. Risk behaviors and STI prevalence were summarized, and the value of microscopy assessed. Associations between prevalent HIV-1 infection and RAI or prevalent STIs were evaluated with multiple logistic regression.
Results: Participants had a high burden of untreated STIs. Symptom-directed management would have missed 67% of urethritis cases in men and 59% of cervicitis cases in women. RAI was reported by 36% of male and 18% of female participants. RAI was strongly associated with HIV-1 in men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.8, 95% CI 2.0-V 6.9), and independently associated with syphilis in women (aOR 12.9, 95% CI 3.4-V 48.7).
Conclusions: High-risk adults recruited for HIV-1 prevention trials carry a high STI burden. Symptom-directed treatment may miss many cases, and simple laboratory-based screening can be done with little cost. Risk assessment should include questions about anal intercourse and whether condoms were used. STI screening, including specific assessment for anorectal disease, should be offered in African research settings recruiting participants at high risk for HIV-1 acquisition.

To read the full text of the study, please click here.





Marcus Conant

3/31/2008
Marcus Conant

Physician; Medical Director, Presidio Pharmaceuticals; Chairman, The Conant Foundation

Why has AIDS not exploded in the heterosexual community during the last 25 years? What should we expect of AIDS rates among heterosexuals in the future? Since before AIDS had a name, Conant has been a leading clinician, researcher and advocate in this field. Come listen to this important discussion that could save your life or that of a loved one.

MLF: LGBT
Location: Club Office
Time: 5:30 p.m. reception, 6 p.m. program
Cost: MEMBERS FREE, $15 non-members
Program Organizer: Stephen Seewer

Get tickets now!





Insight into HIV's 'on-off' switch shows promise for therapy, understanding cellular decisions
March 16, 2008



One in 4 Teen Girls Has a Sexually Transmitted Disease
Greatest burden falls on African-American adolescents, CDC researchers find
By Steven Reinberg
Posted 3/11/08

MRSA Action Group March 10, 2008 / FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Full Text is shown below.





Gay Syphilis Surge in 2007 02/27/2008

Rectal Microbicide Advocates Call For 5x Funding Increase February 25, 2008


Married to HIV


Microbicide gel passes safety test


Growth hormone enhances thymic function in HIV-1–infected adults  

The Journal of Clinical Investigation http://www.jci.org Volume 118 Number 3 March 2008


Novel mathematical model predicts new wave of drug-resistant HIV infections in San Francisco Public release date: 17-Feb-2008


 

HIV vaccine may never be found, warns leading scientist February 14, 2008


'Unacceptable' delay in detecting Brazil AIDS cases: official Feb 14


Number of US primary care doctors down Tue Feb 12


 

Antiretroviral Drugs Could Be Used To Prevent HIV Transmission, Study Says [Feb 07, 2008]


 

Increased Risk of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Abacavir and ddI February 4, 2008


 

Male Circumcision No Aid to Women in Study February 4, 2008



			San Francisco Chronical - Opinion

San Francisco Chronical - Opinion PRIMARY VIEWS Marcus A. Conant  Candidate: Barack Obama February 3, 2008


 

Fight Looms Over Global AIDS Program 02 February 2008


 

Scientists study how HIV hides in body Fri Feb 1, 3:59 PM PST


 

Pfizer To License Antiretroviral To IPM for Reformulation as Microbicide [Jan 30, 2008]


 

Self-Medicating With AIDS Drugs Jan. 28, 2008


 

FDA Approves Tibotec Therapeutics's INTELENCE(TM) (etravirine) for HIV Combination Therapy 1/21/2008


 

After Linking New Strain of Staph to Gay Men, University Scrambles to Clarify January 20, 2008


 

Virus Is Linked to a Powerful Skin Cancer 1/18/2008


 

Dallas scientists stop HIV from spreading in mice January 15, 2008


 

Drug-resistant staph found to be passed in gay sex Jan 14, 2008


 

MSM in Kenya urgently require targeted HIV prevention January 11, 2008


 

Iraq Casualties Tested for HIV 11 January 2008


 

AIDS researchers find protein that greatly boosts HIV infection  December 14, 2007


 

New Rules for HIV-Positive People Visiting U.S. More Restrictive Than Old Regulations, Critics Say [Dec 06, 2007]


 

AIDS Activists Say U.S. Delays Infection Data Release December 3, 2007 14:59 EST


 

Estimate of AIDS Cases In U.S. Rises December 1, 2007



MRSA Action Group March 10, 2008 / FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

If Gay Sex is So Unhealthy, Why are There So Many Healthy Gay Men?

A Response to the Chronicle’s MRSA Story

This last January the Chronicle sparked a global disease scare about an aggressive strain of staph.  A new epidemic was rumored to be headquartered in San Francisco’s gay population. The Chronicle reported the virulent strain "on the loose", "resistant to antibiotics" and headed directly toward America's sacred family value system--you know, the whole "general population" thing.

Anyone tired of that story line?

As reported, this bad bug was sure to get you, especially if you lived within local zip codes. The Chronicle may as well have dubbed it San Francisco's "Zip Code Disease".

Laughing matter or not, there are serious scientific errors in the article, especially relevant for gay men. Errors which have been followed by tsunami after tsunami of the ugliest anti-gay defamation not heard since the early days of the HIV epidemic. The following are typical of public postings found on the web within days of the Chronicle story:

..."Homosexuals should be quarantined to protect society from this plague"... ..."San Fran has to be nuked, save the world before it spreads"...

..."It's called butt fucking, if you don't do it you don't have to worry!"... ... Staff (sic) infection is epidemic in the gay business community"...

..."According to the article all they have to do is shower after they butt fuck and they won't get it, this is why I don't like shaking gay's hands"...

..."It's the bisexuals that spread it all over the place"...

..."Not just the bisexuals... some of the sickest homosexuals will engage in sex with women solely to spread their filthy diseases to heterosexuals"...

In the general population, the public education campaign had begun.

Imagine for a moment how you might feel trying to heal from a new mystery contagion in the context of the cultural war games of the "Concerned Women for America" who took the occasion to characterize "homosexual conduct" as "a breeding ground for the often deadly disease".

Imagine for a moment you are a guy like Todd M., a member of our group and a gay man who was kind  enough to visit an ailing friend in the hospital. A few days later, he came down with a MRSA infection. His infection quickly became severe, painful and difficult to treat, with repeated courses of antibiotics and -repeated outbreaks of MRSA for years. He soon overextended his sick days and lost his job. Then, without income he soon began missing his rent, was evicted from his apartment, and now knows the depth of trauma you can encounter in our broken health care system.

What Todd needs is an angel or a group of angels to provide a shelter in the storm, not defame him when he is ill. Global experience in the HIV epidemic has shown what works for someone like Todd  is to connect with people of compassion and courage--people who can deal skillfully when insults are heaped upon naturally occurring injury.

Hey Chron, You're Getting Under My Skin-

The Chronicle article gave the reader five false impressions:

1. MRSA disease is new.

2. San Francisco is the epicenter of MRSA.

3. The MRSA epidemic is associated with gay men.

4. MRSA is transmitted by gay sex.

5. MRSA is the New AIDS.

Not one of these impressions is true.

1. MRSA disease is NOT new.

MRSA has been around for years and is an equal opportunity infection that affects everyone.

Anyone can find the evidence.

In Feb. of this year a UK journal The Observer reported the aggressive strain of staph USA300 to be "already epidemic in the US" and to be in nine European countries as well as England and Wales. The Brits are way ahead of the USA on staph and find it mostly in hospitals there.

 MRSA disease occurs throughout the world.

Check it out --- Google key words "MRSA""UK" and you will get 2,220,000 web sites to help you deal with education, prevention, support groups, treatment and everything else including natural treatments.

Two months ago a form of MRSA USA300 killed four children in Louisiana and Georgia. Did you hear an alarm bell sounding in the Chron about a "New Killer Plague Emerging from the Bible Belt"?

In August of 2007 Lisa Rosetta of the Salt Lake Tribune reported "4,904 cases of MRSA in Utah, making it the second most common reportable communicable disease". Ever read a front page story about "Mormon capital an epicenter for virulent disease"?

You have to wonder what would have happened at the Chron if someone mistakenly ran that story.

Additionally USA300 has been found for years among pro football players and college sports teams. Ever read a splashy story in the sports section about a "Super Bowl of Infection"?

So now that a handful of gay men here get an infection you have to wonder who decided that it was time for the Chron to decontexualize a global health concern by running a front page story like "S.F. Gay Community an Epicenter for a New Strain of Virulent Staph"???

What were they thinking?

2. San Francisco is not the epicenter of MRSA. Around the world there is no one epicenter of MRSA.

3. MRSA is not unique to gay men.

After the Chronicle story the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta felt it necessary to reassure the public. Their response: "These infections occur in men, women, adults, children and persons of all races and sexual orientations."

4. MRSA is not a sexually transmitted disease. MRSA is and can be transmitted by sex, gay or not—just like a common cold. Sex is not the primary mode of transmission.  

All varieties of staph infection can be transmitted by sexual contact since staph is transmitted by skin to skin contact. The UCSF study quoted by the Chron clearly states:

"Specific sexual behaviors were not assessed or documented in clinic charts; we therefore cannot comment on the association between multidrug-resistant USA300 infection and specific male-male sexual practices."

5. MRSA is not the New AIDS.

Worldwide media picked up the Chronicle story and ran with it, multiplying the effect of the errors and creating panic. After a London Tabloid dubbed MRSA "The New AIDS", Newsweek magazine asked Dr. Henry Chambers, the coauthor of the UCSF study, if "there is a new HIV-like public health epidemic on the horizon?" He replied "This is definitely NOT the new AIDS."

NOT ONE of the five impressions Equating gay men with contagion created by the Chronicle is true!

So what's going on at the Chron?

Is this whole mess due to ignorance, laziness, bone headed malice or mischievous intention?

Who's responsible and who's in charge?

And most important what is the Chron going to do about it and when?

UCSF's Department of Public Affairs has already stepped up to the plate and offered an apology deploring the "negative targeting of specific populations in association with MRSA infections o, other public health concerns". The New York Times has also apologized for inaccuracies in its coverage. At this time no gay community representatives have officially accepted either of the above apologies.